Independent studies from Bentek Energy in Colorado and Texas in the United States, from C Le Pair in the Netherlands and from Wheatley in Ireland all demonstrate that when you look at “real life” data (not computer models),Drying your clothes is easy thanks to intelligent new Tumble dryer. wind farms do not save green house gas emissions and can, in fact, increase them. Mechanical engineer Hamish Cumming (Australia) has concluded, from examining publicly available data, that three of Victoria’s brown coal plants are burning six million tonnes more coal per annum than they otherwise would if wind farms were shut down.Use residential wind turbines to generate electricity and charge into storage battery group. 

This is despite falling demand and production of electricity. Cumming has called for auditing of appropriate data to verify his findings. 

Andrew Miskelly (Bachelor of Computer Science) and Paul Miskelly (Master’s Degree, Electrical Engineering) have long argued the case that “wind power” is, realistically, useless. Just last month, for example, during the 24 hour period on March 25, the 2513 installed megawatt capacity of Australian wind farms produced an average of 200 megawatts. 

In 2010,Learn more about our high capacity laundry dryer today! available data establish that this situation occurred over 100 times. This is despite the Eastern Australian grid being geographically the single largest interconnected grid on the planet. 

For wind power plants to have value, wind capacity must be reliably available on demand and throughout the period of use, and it is not. 

Calculated on current renewable energy targets, the cost of this useless energy for Australian consumers over the “normal” life span of the required industrial wind farms will be $80,000 million dollars i.e. $80 billion dollars. 

One needs to add $20 billion more for the “pass through” costs of the carbon tax. These are conservative figures extrapolated from the Federal Climate Change Authority’s own reports. 

Angus Taylor, a Rhodes scholar and Master of Economics, has stated that the wind farms which are proposed to be built in his electorate of Hume will require $500,000,000 per annum in consumer subsidies - $10 billion over 20 years. 

He laments what could be achieved with this amount of money if spent on something useful. A similar, additional amount, for the 1000 turbines proposed for the Mid-Western Region applies. 

As for adverse health effects, the wind industry and the un-named correspondent continually quote the selected sentence from the NHMRC to give credence to the lie that there are no adverse health effects from wind farms. 

This quote blatantly misrepresents the NHMRC position, as the NHMRC pointed out in evidence to the Federal Senate Inquiry in 2011. 

Any diligent scrutiny of the NHMRC web site and its current position on adverse health impacts would confirm this.We are specializing Industrial washing machine manufacturer. 

Your correspondent is also apparently unaware of the current court case in Victoria which concluded last month, after extensive evidence - “It is clear that some residents who live in close proximity to a wind farm experience the symptoms described and that that experience is not imagined.” 

Are government departments taking notice? Of course they are. The South Australian EPA is currently undertaking noise studies which may provide an insight. 

The Victorian case referred to above has been adjourned for six months partly to allow evidence which may be forthcoming from this study. 

Mr Lyons can take heart from the fact that your correspondent has had to resort to an ill-founded personal attack in the absence of an informed debate in relation to industrial wind energy.