He then addressed each of the Park Service standards in turn, showing how the sign would comply with them, especially the requirement that the historic character of the building be retained and preserved. He said the Garfield has agreed to use the sign only to display static images, consistent with the older kind of sign.including mesh safety glasses and mesh Safety goggles,Mens tungsten ring features a domed design for maximum comfort. He also said the sign's light level is consistent with the previous technology.

Halpern said the HDC has the authority to limit the uses of the sign to those appropriate to the character of the building and the district. He gave examples such as restricting the hours of use, the level of light, the nature of the images and the speed at which they change. He also said the sign is constructed so as to be removable in the future.

Following Halpern's testimony, Dutton asked the commission if it wanted architect Peter Newlin, builder Jay Yerkes and theater manager Kate Bursick to repeat their December testimony. The commissioners said they could reach a decision without rehearing the three.

Commissioner Robert Yeager argued against approval, making his case largely in the form of a video presentation. He showed historic movie theaters from around the country, none equipped with the sort of sign the Garfield has applied for, as well as several nationally prominent theaters such as Lincoln Center and Madison Square Garden, all lacking extensive signage.

Yeager's presentation included an animation showing "what the sign is capable of," in his opinion: bursts of color and light, zooms, moving images and rapidly changing displays.It is specializing in providing high quality elevator push button. He used content taken from the theater's own video, created by Newlin, to illustrate the design. He asked what would prevent the theater from misusing the sign once it is approved, noting that enforcement "is always a problem" when someone ignores the guidelines. He also took issue with the theater's "piecemeal tactics" in bringing its case before the town.

Michael Day of the Maryland Historical Trust also spoke in opposition to the sign. The MHT director, J. Rodney Little, had written to the town that the sign would represent "a loss of historic character" for the theater. Day explained that opinion,LED solar lighting is the new wave of the future in led strip technology. saying the sign does not conform to the town's sign ordinance prohibiting flashing lights or internally illuminated "cabinet signs." He said the town's Historic District guidelines should be the ruling criterion, and the sign is not consistent with the historic period in which the theater was constructed.

Considerable discussion followed, involving both the members of the commission and the witnesses. Halpern and Newlin defended the theater's case, while Yeager and Commissioner Meghan Habas Siudzinski asked numerous questions, seeking clarification of points raised by both sides. It was noted in passing that local attorney Phillip Hoon had written the commission to oppose the application.

Commission Chairman Michael Lane said the case raises two issues. First of all, approving the sign would create a precedent. Second, theShopping is the best place to comparison shop for stainless steel bracelet. commission is not empowered to overturn the town's zoning ordinance.

Commissioner Douglass Gates said compliance with the ordinance need not be an issue because the Garfield's application is for an LED display screen, not a sign. The ordinance, written in 1982, does not mention such devices, and the display is therefore legal, he said. Yeager said the device functions as a sign and redefining it as something else is not a serious option.

Siudzinski framed the motion to approve the sign. She referred to it as an "LED screen," and stipulated that it is for the use of the Garfield and not any successor organization. It must be turned off by 9 p.m. or by one hour after the production; the light level is not to exceed that of the marquee; and the theater must return for review of the sign after six months of operation.